Chatbot
Handles conversations in a specific channel, e.g., on the website, Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, or Discord. Can work scenario-based or with AI.
Best for: FAQ, leads, reservations, simple tickets, and repetitive communication.We build AI-agents for customer service, sales, document analysis, reporting, research and employee support.
We design AI-agents connected to company knowledge, documents, CRM, email, procedures and operational processes. The agent can answer questions, analyze documents, prepare materials, support sales, customer service and employees, and his answers can be limited to approved sources, logged and forwarded for human approval where the process requires it.
AI supports the process and humans control high-risk decisions.
AI-agent for a company is an intelligent assistant designed for a specific business process. May use company knowledge, documents, procedures, CRM, emails, databases and selected tools to support employees or customers with repetitive tasks.
We do not implement AI as a gadget. We start with a specific scenario: what the agent should do, what sources it can use, what it should not do, when it should refuse to answer, when it should pass the matter to a human and how to measure the quality of its performance.
First we organize the range. Thanks to this, AI is not a vague addition, but a specific tool in the process.
Handles conversations in a specific channel, e.g., on the website, Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, or Discord. Can work scenario-based or with AI.
Best for: FAQ, leads, reservations, simple tickets, and repetitive communication.Supports the user in one work area, e.g., helps prepare a response, summarize a document, or find information.
Best for: employee support, summaries, draft creation, and office work.Has instructions, context, tools, and can execute several steps in a process. Can use integrations, save data, and act according to rules.
Best for: sales, customer service, documents, CRM, helpdesk, and operational processes.Uses the company’s approved knowledge base, documents, and procedures to respond in a more controlled way.
Best for: company knowledge, procedures, documentation, FAQ, customer service, HR, and helpdesk.For many companies, the best first step is an AI agent with a RAG knowledge base, because it allows you to start with a safe scenario: a response based on approved documents and procedures.
It makes the most sense where the company has a lot of knowledge, documents, procedures, queries or repetitive tasks, and the team wastes time searching for information and manual summaries.
Procedures, FAQs, documents, and answers are scattered across folders, emails, and spreadsheets.
Employees and customers keep asking about the same things.
Documents must be read, summarized, and classified manually.
Preparing materials for an offer, report, or decision takes too much time.
Salespeople manually analyze inquiries and create similar responses.
Employees use AI without clear rules, sources, and logs.
It is unclear which documents the generated answer is based on.
New hires take a long time to learn procedures and often ask the team about basics.
The team spends time on activities that could be partially automated.
An AI agent can help salespeople analyze inquiries faster, prepare draft responses, create offers, and suggest follow-up questions for the customer.
Examples: lead summary, clarification questions, offer draft, follow-up, CRM note, customer needs analysisAn AI agent can answer repetitive questions, search information in the knowledge base, and prepare responses for a consultant.
Examples: FAQ, suggested response, ticket classification, handover to department, case history summaryAn AI agent can analyze documents, summarize content, extract data, and prepare a list of gaps or risks for human verification.
Examples: PDF analysis, document summary, list of deadlines, list of missing items, document classificationAn AI agent can act as an internal knowledge base for employees and support onboarding of new hires.
Examples: HR procedures, policies, checklists, employee questions, onboardingAn AI agent can classify tickets, propose solutions, and prepare notes for a specialist.
Examples: ticket triage, problem category, proposed solution, escalation, IT knowledge baseAn AI agent can support quick summaries, research, content analysis, and preparation of decision materials.
Examples: report summary, list of conclusions, market research, variant comparison, decision briefAn AI agent can search documentation, manuals, procedures, specifications, and product materials.
Examples: technical manuals, product documentation, service procedures, support for field staffAn AI agent can organize knowledge, analyze documents, and prepare working notes, without replacing the expert responsible for the final decision.
Examples: document summary, list of questions, variant comparison, working draft of a responseFewer repetitive questions and faster access to procedures.
Faster preparation of sales materials and more consistent communication.
Faster handling of repetitive questions and better case handover to the team.
Less manual document reading and faster preparation of applications or conclusions.
Faster research and better preparation for meetings, offers, or decisions.
Less manual report processing and faster understanding of data.
Fewer questions to HR and faster onboarding of new employees.
Faster ticket triage and less manual problem classification.
Better salesperson work based on contact history and fewer forgotten actions.
AI as part of a larger automation, not just a chat.
Fewer repetitive questions and faster access to procedures.
Faster preparation of sales materials and more consistent communication.
Faster handling of repetitive questions and better case handover to the team.
Less manual document reading and faster preparation of applications or conclusions.
Faster research and better preparation for meetings, offers, or decisions.
Less manual report processing and faster understanding of data.
Fewer questions to HR and faster onboarding of new employees.
Faster ticket triage and less manual problem classification.
Better salesperson work based on contact history and fewer forgotten actions.
AI as part of a larger automation, not just a chat.
We design the AI-agent as a controlled company tool. The agent has a specific goal, system instructions, sources of knowledge, roles, limitations, logs, quality tests and rules for transferring matters to a human.
The AI-agent should operate in a predictable and controlled manner. This is not just any AI chat, but a tool that knows its task, uses specific sources and does not exceed established boundaries.
The AI-agent supports the work of the team, but should not independently make legal, tax, medical, financial, HR or other high-risk decisions without the control of a responsible person.
In many processes, AI should not send the final response without control. We design a mode in which the agent prepares a sketch, summary or recommendation, and the human approves the final action.
simple FAQ, procedure search, internal summaries and low risk.
offers, complaints, sensitive data, activities in CRM, sending documents and disputes.
Prices are net amounts. The final quote depends on the number of scenarios, knowledge sources, document quality, number of users, integration, security requirements, logging scope, level of human-in-the-loop and costs of external AI models, hosting or tools.
For companies that want to implement AI but do not yet know which scenario will have the strongest impact and how to do it safely.
Result: list of AI scenarios, priorities, recommended architecture and plan for the first implementation.
Order an AI auditFor companies that want to implement a first simple AI agent for a single scenario.
For companies that want the agent to respond based on documents, procedures, FAQs, terms or company materials.
For companies that want the AI agent to support sales, customer service, documents, CRM, reports or tasks.
For companies that need an agent that performs multiple steps, uses several tools and hands off tasks between roles.
For companies that need an advanced AI solution with multiple scenarios, roles, monitoring, panel, audit and maintenance.
For companies that need a voice agent, call center support, automatic call qualification or voice AI connected with CRM.
For companies that already have a working agent and want to develop scenarios, the knowledge base, quality tests and integrations.
Net prices. The final quote depends on the number of scenarios, knowledge sources, integration, data quality, number of users and security requirements. The costs of AI models, hosting and external tools may be billed separately.
| Package | Starting price | Time | Scenarios | RAG | Integrations | Tools | Human-in-the-loop | Logs | Dashboard | Support | Who it is for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI audit | $763 | 3-7 days | analysis | no | no | no | recommendation | no | no | plan | companies before making a decision |
| Start | $2,605 | 1-3 weeks | 1 | basic base | simple | no | optional | basic | no | 14 days | first agent |
| RAG | $5,763 | 3–6 weeks | 1-2 | yes | optional | no | yes | yes | optional | 30 days | company knowledge |
| Business | $10,500 | 6-10 weeks | several | yes | yes | basic | yes | yes | optional | 45 days | company processes |
| Workflow | $15,763 | 8-12 weeks | several | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | individual | agent in the process |
| Enterprise | $23,658 | from 12 weeks | many | advanced | multiple APIs | yes | yes | audit | yes | SLA | larger companies |
| Voice | $26,289 | from 12 weeks | voice | optional | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | individual | call center / voice |
| Support | $500/month | ongoing | development | update | as needed | as needed | yes | yes | as needed | ongoing | working agent |
The chart is indicative. The final price depends on data quality, number of sources, integration, security requirements and level of human control.
Select the closest range. It does not have to be the final specification - the answers help you choose the MVP, RAG, business, workflow, enterprise or voice variant.
From the selection of the scenario, we go through risk, sources of knowledge, principles of operation, RAG, construction, tests, implementation and monitoring.
We determine where the AI-agent should have the greatest effect.
We define the scope of responsibility and acceptance of a person.
We check documents, procedures, CRM, e-mails and data.
We define the instruction, constraints, style and escalation.
We organize documents and configure the knowledge base.
We configure the model, tools, integrations, logs and control.
We test typical questions, difficult cases and refusals.
We launch the agent and train users.
We analyze logs, improve instructions and develop scenarios.
The project ends with a working tool, documentation and development plan, not just a conversation prototype.
The effect depends on data quality, process and implementation scope, but a well-described scenario can reduce some of the repetitive work.
faster access to company knowledge
less manual writing of similar messages
faster summaries and missing list
more efficient preparation of work materials
The charts are for illustrative purposes only. Actual effects depend on the process, data quality, scope of implementation and the way the team works.
An AI agent should be assessed not only by whether it responds, but primarily by whether it helps in a specific process and works in a predictable way.
last 30 days
on the user side
to human
to improve the instructions
pieces of knowledge
median
most often
sources after review
user reports
by usage
How to handle a complaint after 14 days?
The agent indicates the current fragment of the procedure, provides the conditions for accepting the notification and recommends transferring the case to an employee before sending the final response.
What do we know about the client before follow-up?
Agent retrieves recent notes, opportunity status and open tasks. Prepares a short summary but does not change the status in CRM without user approval.
What obligations result from the attached agreement?
The agent summarizes the indicated points of the contract, marks the source fragments and recommends verification by a responsible person if the question concerns legal risk.
The customer reports a problem with access to the panel.
The agent classifies the ticket, checks the FAQ and proposes a response with instructions. If it detects an unusual error or sensitive data, it forwards the matter to a consultant.
The AI agent should support the team, but should not independently make decisions that require human responsibility, legal, tax, medical, financial or HR interpretation.
In such cases, we design a human-in-the-loop mode: AI prepares a sketch, summary or recommendation, but a human approves the final answer or action.
Not every project requires its own infrastructure. Sometimes a quick MVP is best. In other cases, it is worth building a more controlled architecture with logs, dashboard and constant maintenance.
| Option | Best for | Complexity | Cost | Level of control | When to choose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Agent | simple scenario and one channel | low | lower | basic | when the company wants a quick MVP |
| Agent RAG | company knowledge, procedures and FAQ | medium | medium | high | when answers are to be based on sources |
| Agent with tools | CRM, email, documents and actions after approval | average+ | higher | high | when the agent is to support the process |
| Workflow agent | several steps and several roles in the process | high | higher | high | when AI is part of automation |
| Agent voice | voice and realtime calls | high | high | high | when the channel is telephone or hotline |
| Enterprise agent | multiple sources, roles, audit and maintenance | very high | highest | very high | when AI is operationally critical |
We combine business, technical and process approaches. We don't implement AI just to have ChatGPT in the company. We design an agent that has a specific goal, uses specific sources, operates within established limits and can be developed together with the company.
AI is supposed to solve a specific problem, not be an addition without a purpose.
The agent uses the company's documents, procedures and data.
Replies may be restricted to sources and logged.
The agent can connect to CRM, documents, email and processes.
Important decisions require the approval of a responsible person.
The implementation can start with MVP and expand to include additional scenarios.
The answers are intentionally cautious: An AI agent can support the process, but quality depends on data, scope and control policies.
The simplest implementations start from PLN 9,900 net. An AI-agent with a knowledge base RAG usually starts from PLN 21,900 net. A business agent with integrations, logs and work on processes starts from PLN 39,900 net. A workflow agent or multi-agent starts from PLN 59,900 net. System or enterprise projects start from PLN 89,900 net. AI audit starts from PLN 2,900 net.
A simple AI agent can be ready in 1-3 weeks. Agent with knowledge base RAG typically requires 3-6 weeks. Solutions with integrations, multiple scenarios and security testing may require 6-12 weeks or more.
A chatbot typically handles a single-channel conversation and often follows a script. The AI-agent can use the company's knowledge, tools, integrations, context memory and perform several steps in the process. A chatbot can be part of an AI agent, but an AI agent is a broader solution.
RAG is an approach in which the AI-agent responds using a selected knowledge base, documents or company procedures. This allows answers to be based more on validated sources rather than just the model's general knowledge.
AI should not be treated as an infallible tool. That's why we design instructions, tests, limitations, knowledge sources, logs and escalation to humans. In important processes, AI should prepare a draft or recommendation, and a human should approve the final decision.
Yes. The agent can use PDF documents, procedures, FAQs, regulations, technical documentation, CRM, files and other sources of knowledge. Before implementation, it is worth organizing the documents and determining which sources are current and approved.
Yes. Depending on the system and available API, an agent can retrieve data from CRM, prepare lead summaries, generate response drafts, create tasks, or save notes. The scope of integration depends on the technical capabilities of CRM.
Yes, but such activities should be designed carefully. An agent can prepare a task, a memo, a draft message or a recommendation. In the case of activities that influence customer, financial data, statuses or business decisions, it is worth adding human approval.
Yes, but we recommend distinguishing between low-risk responses and responses requiring human control. Simple FAQ questions can be handled automatically, while offers, complaints, decisions and sensitive matters should have an acceptance stage.
Security depends on the implementation architecture, model provider, data storage, permissions and integration. We design solutions with access control, logs, limitation of knowledge sources and the possibility of implementation in a more controlled environment if the process requires it.
Yes. The knowledge base should be updated as procedures, documents and the company's offer change. This can be done manually, periodically or as part of ongoing monthly care.
The purpose of the AI-agent is not to replace the team, but to relieve it of repetitive tasks, search for knowledge and prepare materials faster. Employees continue to make decisions, evaluate responses, and handle matters requiring accountability.
Yes, you can build a voice or realtime agent that recognizes speech, responds with voice and connects to selected systems. However, such a project is more complex and requires more thorough conversation tests, transfer to a human and monitoring.
Yes. Most often, we recommend starting with one scenario, e.g. AI-agent of company knowledge, FAQ, document analysis or sales support. After checking the quality and effects, further scenarios can be developed.
It is best to prepare sample questions, documents, procedures, FAQs, process descriptions, a list of company tools and information about who will use the agent. If the company has a lot of documents, it is worth indicating which ones are current and approved.
Based on a few sentences, we will prepare a recommendation: an AI audit, a simple AI-agent, an agent with a knowledge base RAG, a solution with integrations, a workflow agent or a larger system project.
We build AI agents for customer service, sales, document analysis, report generation, internal research and employee support. SmartCodeIT starts with the process, data, current tools, risks and expected first stage. Only then do we choose the technology, integration, scope of automation and human control method.
The effect depends on data quality, integration, process, scale and team work. High-risk processes require human control, logs and clear accountability.
A few concrete sentences are enough for us to suggest an audit, automation, an AI agent, a web application or a systems integration.